A confession

I’ve had this bumbling round in my head for a while, and iMonk‘s post on a broadly similar subject has prompted me to get my arse into gear and write about it. It’s kind of a tricky subject, and some people aren’t going to like it, but please, hear me out.

See, now, here’s the deal: I don’t like Evangelism. There, I’ve said it. Stone me now.

Now, if you’re a Christian from the same sort of background as me, you’re probably thinking something along the lines of: “Well, yes, it’s scary doing that whole sharing your faith thing, telling people about God and Jesus and how they need to be saved and that.” And yes, it is. I know, I’ve done a lot of it (and quite often made a fool of myself in the process). But that’s not what I mean. I mean that I am deeply uncomfortable with the whole idea of Evangelism; or at least, with the way we’re supposed to be going about it.

Now, part of this stems from the fact that yes, I am shy and no, I don’t like imposing myself on people (unless I’ve had a few beers, in which case I get all mouthy and ranting, but by that point I’m usually past my best for discussing theology anyway). And it also partially stems with that sort of gut postmodern fluffy moral relativist feeling I’ve got in my stomach that makes me wonder if I’ve really got any sort of right at all to go around telling people what to believe.

But the really serious thing is – I have doubts. It’s a dirty word, but every Christian does. Those who don’t are either lying or crazy. I have questions to which I don’t know the answers – important questions, too, not just little issues of dogma or liturgy. And these questions and doubts are important – they are not little issues to be swept under the rug and turned over to scriptural dogmatics or dismissed with a shrug and a “Well, we can’t know the mind of God”. They are things that need to be wrestled with, talked about openly and honestly and thought deeply about – and we also need to be open to the fact that many things will still continue to be without an answer; but, like an imponderable Zen Koan, it is more important that we think about these things that actually arrive at an answer.

My faith, therefore, is a journey; a dialogue, if you will. It’s been going on for a lot longer than that day, 10 years ago, when I gave my life to Christ (to use a deeply loaded and confusing phrase) – although that was clearly a hugely important milestone along the way – and it will continue on for a lot longer than where I am today. It is a fluid thing – as my dialogue with others (corporeal entities or otherwise) continues, my beliefs will continue to change, to be moulded by my experience. And it is that journey, far more than the final destination, that is the important thing.

I can’t, therefore, go out and tell someone that they’ve got to believe what I do otherwise they’re going to burn in hell/suffer the torment of eternal separation/be moody forever because they don’t like the afterlife, because I am not that dogmatically sure that I want people to believe the same as I do, and I really hope I never do reach the point where I am so sure I have all the right answers that I am willing to sit on my big fat theologcal arse and go no further. Therefore, to preach a definitive “recipe for salvation” – which I have done in the past – would be deceptive on my part.

There is an important caveat, though. And that is the fact that I do still have the beliefs I have and, if they are true, then some things do demand some kind of response, because they have profound implications for the way this world we live in works.

So. I am unwilling to beat people over the head with a Bible, to tell them that their soul is damned and that unless they turn to Christ they will suffer eternal separation from God. I am unwilling to sell the idea of a simple quick-fix Jesus to solve all your emotional, spiritual and physical needs. But I would encourage people to be open and honest, to be aware of their own journey, and, more specfically, to listen to the claims made in the Bible and to consider taking them seriously. I would hope that, as part of my journey, my everyday actions can become more of an ambassador for my beliefs than dogmatic preaching could ever be. And if that means I can stir a few hearts and minds and set a few people off in a new direction on their own journeys, then that must be a good thing, right?

8 Responses to “A confession”

  1. Richard McIntosh says:

    Perhaps we have got it wrong and Jesus is not the answer he is the question.

  2. Sven says:

    Dude you so have to read Brian Maclaren.

  3. Peter says:

    ‘beat people over the head with a Bible’… you don’t appear to not like Evangelism, you don’t like dishonest evangelism or just pat answers. Who does? Sharing your faith is a natural process; sharing your doubts and journey is all part of that. To say that Jesus is the answer and leave it at that would be arrogant at best (even though he is, if you see what I mean). That said, if people don’t hear about Jesus at all, in any way shape or form…

    Hmm, that’s a bit garbled. Hope you see what I mean.

  4. Thérèse says:

    I love what you wrote.

    I went to a workshop/revival/retreat/whatever in February, and met a lot of interesting people. Interesting people with interesting points of view, but the one thing that stuck with me the most and is likely to stay with me forever is my encounter with a man who although is a bishop, is not afraid to say the words “I do not know.”

  5. jeni says:

    Hmm.. I was going to write a comment about how evangelism isn’t about beating people over the head with a bible, how it isn’t about telling somebody to believe all the bits and pieces of what you believe, of how it’s just introducing someone to Jesus and letting them start their own journey, but am wondering if you’ll be cynical about that as well.
    But your last paragraph, about your actions being more of an ambassador for your beliefs than dogmatic preaching could ever be, if people see your faith but are never told why you do what you do then doesn’t that defeat the point?
    Would you answer questions if you were asked? Or would you consider that evangelism and not answer them? Why do you believe what you believe? Who introduced you to Jesus, why did you decide to ‘give your life to Christ’? Ah, so many questions. I just had to answer a lot of them, to Andrew Cursham. That was interesting. Anyway I’ve gone on enough so I’ll sign off now…

  6. jeni says:

    oops sorry

  7. Kyle says:

    Well said, man. I happen to believe very strongly that being honesty with those doubts and sharing a ‘dialogical’ faith is a better, more legitimate, and more honest take on ‘evangelism’ than what usually passes for it. It’s not only ‘sharing Jesus,’ but sharing a way of being with Jesus. Cool, man.

  8. […] the past, I’ve made no secret of the fact I’m no great fan of evangelism. Now, a lot of things have changed since I wrote that post – I’m in a different place, […]